Archive for the ‘Search Engine Optimisation’ Category

The new Yahoo! & Bing search engine is being tested.

We’ve been telling you about the future collaboration between Yahoo! and Bing in a past post: Is the Yahoo! switch to Bing an anti-google strategy?. Well, it is now official, the first tests have been made in the USA and Canada as stated by this morning’s post on the Bing Community Blog. According to Yahoo!’s post on Yahoo! Search Blog, 25% of the paid and organic traffic now generated on the US Yahoo! search results are from Bing.

Preparing your site for Bing & Yahoo!

It seems that there will be some changes in the way the Bingbot will be crawling websites. One will have to concentrate on only one bot when it comes to search engine optimisation now. This means that the Yahoo! Slurp will be killed and that webmasters will have to make full use of the Bing Webmaster Center to optimise their SEO on Bing. If one has not done it until now, it will now become an important element as all will go through only one pipe now

For webmasters, it’s important to be familiar with how the Bing crawler interacts with your site. After the full algorithmic transition is complete, you only need to optimize for one crawler (Bing), as we will provide Yahoo! with results from our index.

Bing Webmaster Center, the new place to be.

With this new roll out, the Bing Webmaster Center will prove to be a valuable source of information and will also be a great toolbox for the optimisation of one’s website. Even if you rely a lot more on traffic generated by Google Caffeine, you will have to make sure that your indexation and your presence in results pages at Bing’s are really correct as the same elements will be used in Yahoo!.

Using FIR [Fahrner Image Replacement] – Part 1 – Basic implementation.

When I launched the new template used on this blog some weeks back, a discussion started out on the use of FIR, the Fahrner Image Replacement technique, on the H3 tags I used on the widgets in the different sidebars. Actually, these are not widgets per se as they are hard coded as small included files to maximise load time. An internal recipe if you want. Anyway, the main idea behind using FIR, which is a really old technique, is that I wanted the specific use of images just for these H3s. As pointed out in the comments, I did not go for heavy DOM scripting driven font apps such as Typekit or Google Fonts just because I had no need for these. If I had specific fonts to use for bigger portions I would have used those or Cufòn.

Usability and SEO.

FIR is not the only technique you can use for replacing text with images. You have several techniques which you can find out with a simple Google search. There’s also the sIFR, the Scalabe Inman Flash Replacement, which used Flash to replace text defined by web design guru Shaun Inman. There are 2 reasons why I like the Fahrner Image Replacement technique: usability and SEO. Its use maximises these two core elements. How? Simply because when all CSS are deactivated (which is the case for screen readers) the content is still present. This therefore keeps the content that is associated with the H tag. You can relate to this past article if you want more information on the importance of H tags. Please keep in mind that the way I use the FIR solution is a bit different from the original versions. As a matter of fact, I play more on semantics to reduce the use of unnecessary HTML tags.

Implementing FIR.

Basis.

The FIR implementation is fairly simple. You need to have an image file bearing your graphical text. The magic occurs with the use of CSS to get the text out of the way and replace it with this image. This is an all CSS technique which means that if there is any CSS failure, the fall back will just be the plain text. So here is a piece of simple code:

<html>
<head>
	<title>FIR technique</title>
</head>
<body>
	<h3>This is the text to be replaced</h3>
</body>
</html>

The replacement image is the following:

Hiding the text.

Now let’s get into the CSS-fu. First of all we need to “hide the text”. We cannot use the visibility attributes because we will not be able to exploit the H3 box that is generated. What we can do is reposition the text inside that box. Actually we will reposition it outside the box and even outside the screen, so far that no simple user screen can show the text. Here is how it goes (you will notice that I’m not using a separate CSS file for this just for the sake of the example):

<<html>
<head>
	<title>FIR technique</title>
	<style type="text/css">
		h3{
			text-indent: -9999px;
		}
	</style>
</head>
<body>
	<h3>This is the text to be replaced</h3>
</body>
</html>

The text-indent implementation throws the text at 9999 pixels on the left of the screen, so it will not be visible at all.

Replacing the text.

Still with CSS, we need will now get the image to occupy the space left. The image does not actually occupy the space, it sits as a background image and we will be tweaking the heights and widths to adjust to the image.

<html>
<head>
	<title>FIR technique</title>
	<style type="text/css">
		h3{
			text-indent: -9999px;
			background: url(replacement.png) no-repeat center left;
		}
	</style>
</head>
<body>
	<h3>This is the text to be replaced</h3>
</body>
</html>

The background uses the URL attribute to call the image. The no-repeat attribute says all that it does and the center attribute centres the image vertically and the left attribute sets it to the left. If the image were too large for the containing box we would be using paddings to increase its size. Here for example, we are increasing the top and bottom paddings by 10 pixels each:

<html>
<head>
	<title>FIR technique</title>
	<style type="text/css">
		h3{
			text-indent: -9999px;
			background: url(replacement.png) no-repeat center left;
			padding: 10px 0;
		}
	</style>
</head>
<body>
	<h3>This is the text to be replaced</h3>
</body>
</html>

See the final result in action here.

Get started…

You can now get started with FIR. It is a simple but effective technique. You can download the source files here. Keep in mind that this technique does not apply only for H tags but for nearly all the tags that you can use. For example, on this site, the link on the logo actually uses FIR. In the following part, we will see how you can optimise your use of FIR.

Edit & precisions

I would like to stress on the fact that this technique is considered as “fail” by a lot of people because of the advent of font faces. As I stated in the intro to this article, if I had larger portions of text to change I would have used them. Knowing this technique is handy for your web design culture/education as well as if you have to choose between going for Javascript external calls or CSS for very small elements. Please note that the original technique was not accessible or usable because it used flawed visibility techniques. This version corrects this with the use of the text indent attribute.

Driving targeted traffic to your site: 3-5% bounce rate!

Targeting a site’s readership, especially when one has a blog, is not an easy task. On going over some websites, I have seen that many would publish their level of hits or visits in one day. Some are pretty awesome when imagining some 30,000 visits in one day. Everybody would dream of that. This would mean huge monetisation programmes, nice level of side income, “influence” and all that goes with it. When delving into SEO and community management, one has to take into consideration another parameter, which might actually be a better indicator than the level of traffic. This indicator is the bounce rate. Bounce rate is what really defines the success of a website. If people are entering and leaving your site in less than 5 seconds, you might need to have a serious talk with you community management and your SEO experts.

Bounce rate fluctuations.

You might have noticed that a bounce rate can either fluctuate a lot on a website or stay put over a long period of time. This goes with the quality of your traffic. Most of the time, the fluctuations will be of more or less 10%. Higher fluctuations and, at that, frequent ones mean that there might be something weird happening on your website. Even if these are not what you would first look at, I sincerely think that important bounce fluctuations should be used as alerts on the health of a website.

3-5% Bounce rate?

Now, you might have come here to see if it can really be done? The answer is “yes”. This very blog, the Web Design Bureau of Mauritius, has been set up to do this. After the first weeks of its launch I tried to find a way of making this site stand out. There were too many odds against it as there is no real web design community in Mauritius but the idea was to get to that very small web engaged community out there. And it worked! The aim was to target that specific traffic and this is what is happening today. Below is a screenshot of one year’s publications. 3.19% bounce rate over a whole year.

The secret…

Actually, there’s no secret to this specific rate at all. It all goes in what you will read on all “how to blog” sites out there. Write for your targeted audience and keep it for them, not even search engines, the rest will follow. It is the only thing I did. What about you? What is your bounce rate and how are you working with/on it?

I’ve been warned that this would not last long once I get more traffic coming. Anyway, so far so good and it’ll be good till it lasts.

Beating Google Adwords competition by using your competitor’s brand name.

In terms of traffic management I primarily focus on organic traffic as it is the type of traffic that is really targeted and that comes to a site to really use the content that’s generated. The Web Design Bureau of Mauritius has always been proud of its 3% bounce rate over 2 years. Now, Google Adwords and PPC traffic is a whole different thing. Getting your fingers in such a cogwheel implies that you’ve tried and tested the techniques on small or medium sized campaigns before entering the big picture. My biggest picture has been a 1 year campaign at 3000€ per month for a client. I will not be giving a lecture on how to use Google Adwords and make the best use of it. There are better people than me when it comes to explaining this subject, I can just invite you to meet them over at PPC Hero.

Beating the Google Adwords competition.

So what is this beating the Google Adwords Competition about? When you go on a Google Adwords crusade, you usually have competitors on the same line, bidding higher than you to reach the top positions in the sponsored links to drive traffic to their site. Now, the big problem is: where do you hit the hardest to get the Google Adwords treasure? The answer is brand name! As weird as this might seem I’m going to give away one of Google’s most mysterious tricks to beat Google Adwords competition with the use of brand names. I stumbled on this by chance and readily understood the implications. This one is not a secret but it is not talked about too much.

Use your competitor’s brand name.

Provided you’re not going to fight Ebay, Amazon or Coca-Cola, you can use your competitors’ brand name to divert their traffic to your site. Here’s how this goes, you can use your competitors’ trademarked terms as keywords in Google Adwords. This depends on whether they have set a record at Google’s to have the keywords reserved or not. Many companies, maybe even your’s, don’t know that there’s this little loophole in Google Adwords and have not done the necessary to shut down the traffic diversion. This is all explained in this discussion I found in the Google Adwords archive. Many big companies seem to have arrangements with Google Adwords, otherwise anybody can bid on a trademark as a keyword. This smells fishy, especially if you’ve registered your trademark, but it actually is true.

Real life experiment.


I wouldn’t be giving out this trick to beat Google Adwords competition without being 100% sure that this can be done, would I? I did a test on Google. One big trademark would be the famous Kawasaki motorcycles. I just typed the trademark name in Google and, hey presto, Google Adwords showed me what their competitors (or sellers) were doing with the keyword.

Aaaaannnnnd, action!

Here you go then. You now have something to beat Google Adwords competition in one go by directly tackling the competitors’ brand names. This also means that you must not be afraid to get in that mine field either. I’m just trying to imagine, say, Le matinal, L’express, Defi Media and Le Mauricien hitting on each other’s keywords on Google ***drooool***.

Google Caffeine will now force companies to blog.

We’ve been talking a lot about the Google Maday update as well as Google Caffeine, the new algorithm. Though this would seem like talking over and over about the same thing, we must take into consideration the huge impact that this new algorithm has on the whole web, search engine optimisation and users ecosystem. The web is an ever changing entity and the “addons” that influential web companies publish always have an effect on the way users will be interacting with websites. This is what Google did by launching Google Caffeine.

Fresh content, the new El Dorado.

Let us jump back to what Google told web professionals on Google Caffeine some two weeks ago. The core elements to take into consideration are:

[Google] Caffeine provides 50 percent fresher results for web searches than our last index. [...] Searchers want to find the latest relevant content and publishers expect to be found the instant they publish.

This means that the way the Google index worked before, though not completely removed, is currently pushed aside to favour a new way of indexing. This new way of indexing takes information as it is published, analyses it and sends it directly into the first (freshest) results that the search engine will be delivering to its users. The impact is that fresh information will always have a lead, be it small, on the old system of having capitalising on age for a page indexed on a given theme.

Impact on companies.

This crosses one of my everlasting belief that companies need to produce more fresh content to keep up with the pace at which the whole system is running. A company can have a website and be communicating on it but if the new deal is that the company regularly publishing content on its own field gets the topmost ranks in search engine results pages then the cards are being redistributed.

This also means that everything like tests and sandboxes are being shattered to pieces (though Google Caffeine must have a sort of filter on that). A younger company with a younger website publishing fresher and to the point content will now be able to compete with the old mammoths. Result: increased competition directed by the Big G. Could anyone have thought that Google Caffeine would have had that much influence on business communication models?

Blogs are not crutches but tools.

Right oh! The solution, as anybody would have imagined is to implement professional business blogs on company websites. Blogs have the flexibility of being readily editable and can produce a lot of tools to improve indexation, social media interaction and drive leads. These are the new tools for indexation and traffic and community managers will be the new guardians of web traffic and notoriety.

It will now become a standard if one wants to stay in the race as Google Caffeinee is implementing it. New search habits are bound to crop up and new SEO techniques will show their face. What business need to understand now is that blogs might be the best way to catch up with the others. As things go, many companies will be launching up blogs with a lot of content copied and pasted from other sites or from their “paper material” but here things will be different. Real blogging rules will have to be used, those levers defining the quality of content and the targeting of traffic will become real in business spheres and those who will be using these as tools rather than crutches to their SEO will be those getting something out of Google Caffeine.

EDIT 24-06-2010. To illustrate the words.


This edit comes 18 hours later. I’ve been following the indexation of this article and as shown above, this post has, for example, hit Google’s first search engine results page when searching for “google caffeine” just after publication just because of the freshness of the article.

New rules.

Do you think that businesses will readily see all the implications of the change in the Google algorithm? Will a large number of those turn towards blogs or will it just be a flop with everybody remaining in their classic seo tryouts and hiding in their niche? Is this the advent of blogs? Do you think that Google Caffeine is a way for Google to push companies towards blogs while signing the death of websites in their classic style?

Yahoo! Search will be switching to the Bing engine – anti Google Caffeine?

It is now official. The Yahoo! Search portal will be switching to the Bing search engine by September 2010 according to the latest thread on Webmasterworld. The portal will be integrating and testing Microsoft’s tool in August and September before going on a full fledged launch.

Long tail keywords.

The Yahoo! and Microsoft partnership has been and is still seen as a battle of dollars to break the “monopoly” held by Google in terms of search marketing. However, there seems to be a reason to the acceleration of this partnership and it is called “Google Caffeine“. Remember the Google Mayday Update? This was the test run for Google’s new algorithm called “Google Caffeine“. The ultimate objective for Google is to be able to understand what a user really means when the it types a specific keyword. This would call for distinct research in language usage. This also explains why the “Google Caffeine” text mainly affected long tail keywords, these being more specific.

A breach?

The big problem of the “Google Caffeine” launch, if this can be qualified as problem, is that it cleared up and re-indexed a lot of pages based on long tail keywords. The “assumed” result has been the throwing out of a large number of huge traffic making pages from big websites. This being said, a lot of professionals have had direct recourse to paid search traffic, increasing ppc sales. Many have seen this as a breach in Google’s monopoly as it resulted in a certain loss of confidence in the search engine. You might look at the comments on my post on the Google Mayday Update and you’ll see that a lot of persons being concerned by the ferocious way Google managed to do this. And here might be Yahoo!’s opportunity to gather all the stray lambs around its search church.

Let’s talk about this…

It will be a long battle before anybody can hit the hegemony of Google in the domain of search applications but each bit of the battlefield left bare by the engine will be taken up by the opponents. Do you think that Yahoo! and Microsoft have seen a real breach here to be try and win some length over Google and its “Google Caffeine“?

Custom Search: make the most out of Google Maps with optimized geolocation results

Following your permanent update quest for visibility and content optimisation purposes you may have noticed that, after being so global, web search results pages are becoming more and more local. We do tend toward custom search, and this is just the beginning.

Your goal: do better at SEO rankings.

Creating your own Google Maps file nowadays is still a bonus for your website’s SEO. But let’s bet it will soon become unavoidable. Why is that so?

Google Maps files benefit from a great ranking place in Google’s results pages, and appear almost every time, especially since Google’s upgraded its search interface in March 2010. It firstly concerned keywords with location within the keywords (town, country, zip code …), but has now been extended to many other keywords.

You probably know what this is all about as you may have keywords where your website was at top ranking position, which are now… still in top position, but… After Google Maps results!

I.E. Below with the famous French travel guide www.petitpaume.com : it long has been top of any keywords such as “restaurant + (town)” (“restaurant lyon”). Now, with Google Maps results, it certainly is less visible, and suffers great lost of targeted audience. (click on image for larger view)

Best practices.

Let’s have a look at the specifications required within Google Local to optimise your own dedicated Google Maps business file. In practice, little changes were noticed concerning Google Maps standards, so few optimisations and adjustments in time may be necessary to reach sustainable rankings on specific keywords and keep them.

Criteria:

Content (we will have a deeper look at this section below).

  • Use keywords in the title and within the description.
  • Choose carefully the categories you will put your Google Maps file in.
  • Use pictures (and videos if possible).

Be credible.

  • The more your file is closed to be fully complete the better.
  • Use a local phone number and local postal address.
  • Add your website URL and email contact.
  • Seniority counts (as for domain names): so do not wait to create your own Google Maps file!

You must have a landing page (do not rely on your website homepage), and dedicated to your Google Maps file.

  • Same address, same telephone number (local, of course).
  • Presentation: make it like a VCard.
  • Use keywords in the Title and H1.
  • Description, contents and URL rewriting optimised on this landing page (on specific keywords).

Popularity ranking exists: use it!

  • Notifications to your Google Maps file (links and direct Web users’ posts and positive feedbacks on Google Maps), backlinks quality (keywords within the links).
  • Submit to phones / addresses directories (Leshoraires.fr, PagesJaunes.fr, Kompass, 118218.fr…), local directories (Lyon-Web.fr), and directly connected to your field / area of expertise directories (Lyonresto.com …).

What you should absolutely not do:

  • Submit several files at the same address, and with the same title.
  • Use your landing page to display other addresses (if you have several branches, create one Google Maps file and one dedicated landing page for each).
  • Over optimise (excessive keywords density).
  • Do not use too many capital letters (spam).
  • HTML encoding in description area, titre more than 60 characters.
  • Use of reserved and surcharged telephone numbers (0 800 …).

Make your Google Maps file SEO friendly.

Google Maps can be great for keywords optimisation. But be careful: use maximum 2 or three keywords, and these have to correctly describe your business activity. Anyway, you will soon find out by yourself that you will not be able to optimise more unless being blacklisted!

Your Google Map Title (60 characters maximum)

Your Title has to contain keywords (1 or 2). As much as possible, you should write down something that looks like a natural web search.
Your Title must be short as your Google Maps file will be displayed considering your entire Title.

Your description (200 characters maximum)

Description must contain keywords, maximum 3 of them, if possible already used in your Title (for more efficiency, prefer up to 130 characters). This description has to be appalling because the clicks and hard bounce rates matter for your popularity score.

Categories

You can set up to 5 categories on your Google Maps file. You must choose at least one which is referenced in the Google Business local center. Then, you can create specific categories with keywords: these have to match your activity had be as short as possible (please do not make a list of keywords …).

Additional information

Additional field can be added at the end of your Google Maps file. They can participate to your SEO ranking if well used (with keywords). These fields normally can help your business to be more specific, i.e. for a restaurant, specify the nearest parking, or detail the menu. You could add something like “Your restaurant in Lyon suggests …” for your “The Chef suggestion” section …

Pictures (logos and other photos)

Always put a picture in your Google Maps file, as it is a lot more attractive with one, and also can be optimised (name your photos with keywords : “restaurant-in-lyon.jpg”).

Well…

Of course, you want to keep up, won’t you?

So use search engines tools to geolocate your company and services, and make the most of SEO possibilities in this field. Google Maps will be just right for you. Create your own business Google file at Google Place http://maps.google.com/local/add (previously Google Business Local Center).

Google MAYDAY update is affecting long tail keyword rankings.

“Mayday”, term known for those in need of help! This is also the name coined to the latest Google Caffeine update. If you’re a keen Search Engine Optimiser or webmaster you’ve surely seen some signs of major updates at Google’s. The Google Mayday update has been running for nearly a month now though many have just recently been aware of the reality of this major update. So what is this Google Mayday update, what does it bring, and what specificities does it have?

Why Mayday?

The Google Mayday term might be amusing but it is not really. Mayday has been chosen first because the update is taking place in May and second because it is hitting websites in terms of ranking in the search engine results pages (SERPs). Now, are you spotting any difference in your rankings? If not, you should check if you’ve been ranking on “long tail keywords”. The Google Mayday update has been affecting long tail keywords rankings mostly as the algorithm seems to have been set to reorganise ranking on such keywords. I’ve seen major changes on some of my websites ranking on such keywords. Second, some websites are so affected by this update that it is a real “Mayday” call out that is being made.

Novice watch!

For those who are just finding out this term “long tail keywords”, here is a quick overview. When talking about keywords we usually refer to 1 word keywords being essential to a site such as website, seo, ranking, expert, etc. In many cases we cannot be competitive on such keywords because of the amount of “pollution” in the results pages. The solution is then to use “long tail keywords” especially in Mauritius as we’re targetting a Mauritian audience. We’ll then get long tail keywords like “search engine optimisation mauritius”. This has the disadvantage of not being well indexed on general keywords but do a great job sending highly-targetted traffic from those people searching exactly for these specific information online.

Good news or bad news?

Is Google Mayday update good or bad for your website? The answer is: it depends. Here is what has been noticed. If you’ve been ranking high on some long tail keywords for some time but have not really managed it, chances are that your page might be plummeting in the rankings. On the other side, you might be catching up with some competitors on other long tail keywords if you’ve been working on these. All in all, the Google Mayday update might be positive as well as negative for a same website. Nothing is definitive for the time being as the Google “Mayday” update is still running as of today.

Let’s talk about this…

Have you noticed a change in your rankings these past days? Did the Google Mayday Update affect your site(s)? What are your views on long tail keywords, do you use them a lot, especially in Mauritius?

The secret of strong and em tags.

Some HTML tags often draw confusion because of their similarities with other tags as well as the way in which they display and style content. Examples of these are blockquote, cite, strong, em or i. Each element has features and, though they might accomplish the same goal, they might be altogether really different. Knowing those differences will help improve the markup of some pages. We’ll concentrate on those important tags that are strong, b,em and i.

Conveying structure.

These tags, though small ARE important. They are actually more used than we would like to admit and their first use is to give better sense to the content. Putting a word in bold or in italics cannot mean anything else but that the word is important and that we want to draw the reader’s attention to that word. Well, the W3C has created the strong and em tags so that the markup can convey the same importance given to that word. This is the basic idea of it all. So the first thing you need to know about these tags is that b and i are presentational elements while strong and em are structural. This explains why so many web designers would be telling you to swap the use of b for strong and i for em.

How and why?

Big question now. How and why (and probably when) to use these. The question might sprout especially when considering the fact that the b and i elements are not deprecated. Let’s look at how the W3C defines these tags: em indicates emphasis and strong indicates stronger emphasis. Bingo, the answer has been here all the time. Both of them are a way to convey importance to a word or a text but there are 2 levels of emphasis here. This tells you when and why you should use them in your code though b and i would have the same presentational effects but will only be giving information on the fact that the text is in bold or italics or not.

But wait, there’s more to this. The use of those tags have an impact on the way screen readers and search engine robots see the content.

Accessibility.

In terms of accessibility, a screen reader uses the strong and em tags are emphasis levels. Screen readers will, as the W3C puts it, “change the synthesis parameters, such as volume, pitch and rate accordingly”. This surely nails it. If we were using b and i to have visual representation we can get to a higher level by using strong and em as they will be doing the same visual job while conveying the structure and working towards more acessibility.

Search engine optimisation.

This information should be used regardless of whether you’re using strong, em, b or i tags. These participate in search engine optimisation. How?

Simply by taking advantage of the human element in the search engine robot’s algorithm. Here is the general concept: if a word is set under emphasis, it means that the author wants this particular word to stand out of the rest to catch the reader’s attention. This might therefore be considered as a KEYWORD! This is how the strong and em elements are treated as conveying emphasis, therefore helping SEO.

However, don’t run over and start stuffing keywords in your content and emphasising them with half a dozen strong and em tags around them. You’d be telling the robots you’re spamming them.

One step further

Some extra points here. If you need to have presentational enhancements to your strong or em tags the common practice is to wrap a strong tag around an em tag like this:

<strong><em>This is the emphasised text</em></strong>

The problem here is that you are giving a level 2 emphasis to an already level 1 emphasised text. This would not mean anything in terms of structure though it will in terms of presentation. Let alone in terms of accessibility.

There is a solution to this: Cascading Style Sheets. Let’s imagine you need all texts in bold and in italics but still want to keep your levels of emphasis, you would style your tags like this:

strong {
    font-style: italic;
}
em {
    font-weight: bold;
}

Digging even more into this, you can add classes to those tags which will give you 4 visual presentations of emphasised texts while keeping the 2 levels of emphasis.

strong {
}
em {
}
.bold {
    font-weight: bold;
}
.italic {
    font-style: italic;
}

You would be using them in your code as such.

<em class="bold">This is the emphasised text</em>
<strong class="italic">This is the emphasised text</strong>

A final word.

There you have it then. A full overview of the secret of the strong and the em tags compared to the b and the i tags. Any questions? Drop them in the comments!

Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) for “coming soon” pages.

You might have been working on a new website project for some time or are planning to launch a new site. You have prepared your project, secured your host and domain name and prepared your database. You will now be heading for either deployment or development but know that your site will not be online for some time. You will most of the time use a dummy, a “coming soon” page. This page must be optimised for search engines!

Anatomy of a “coming soon” page.

Most of you have heard of “coming soon” pages. There’s a huge collection of those online teasers for great new apps or sites that will be found on the server some time in the future. For many projects, a deadline for launch is settled, for others the launch can vary from a week to a year in extreme cases, and maybe more… So it might be a good thing to prepare your “coming soon” page.

Such page usually consists of:

  • Information on what the future website will be about.
  • What the website will be marketing.
  • Launching date.
  • Update/launch signup forms to acquire prospects.
  • Providing short updates for buzz.

Other uses?

Many companies use their “coming soon” page to pre-establish their brand-name by working a lot on the visual impact and the message. Other strategies include the creation of Twitter accounts to gather some followers as well as Facebook pages, all interlinked with the “coming soon” page. There is a lot to get from such a page but you can try getting even more by SEO-ing the page.

Why should you SEO it?

The “coming soon” page must be optimised for search engines for many reasons. First of all we must take one important fact into consideration with search engines basing ourselves on the Google algorithm.

The Google Sandbox.

Google gives weight to older pages and domain names. This is why the Google Sandbox exists. It is here to prevent younger sites from hitting on older ones which already have the big G’s respect. You might not know when your site will be launched but optimising it will help you have an online presence and above all be out of the Google Sandbox when you launch it if you have been lagging a bit behind.

Nurturing your future ranking.

You have competitors on your main keyword on Google. Optimising your “coming soon” page for that keyword will get the domain name and the page to start competing for better rankings on it. At the time of the launch you might even be surprised by how fast your ranking will be evolving. This is one extremely good reason to do this.

Getting Google page rank.

Google page rank is one thing some webmasters live by. Even if it is not as important a factor as it was before it is an indication of the good health of a site. Good page rank is simply built through backlinks and site age. If your site is taking a whole year for launch, why should you lose one year’s PR and backlinks (which you can start building through comments or links from other sites)? A good example is inhousegrind which has a Google page rank of 3 while still bearing a “coming soon” page.

Let’s talk about this.

Using search engine optimisation techniques for “coming soon” pages is a great option on a whole site’s SEO. All the SEO juice gained over the “coming soon” period will be redistributed to the other parts of the website when the latter is launched. I have personnally tested and used this technique and the returns are always positive. Why not try it then?

Speeding your page load time will improve your Google ranking.

It is now official. Speeding up a site’s page delivery will be beneficial for each page’s ranking in the the Search Engine Results Pages (SERPs). So speed is now a ranking factor at Google. This has been officially announced on the Official Google Webmaster Central Blog.

Speeding up websites is important — not just to site owners, but to all Internet users. Faster sites create happy users and we’ve seen in our internal studies that when a site responds slowly, visitors spend less time there. But faster sites don’t just improve user experience; recent data shows that improving site speed also reduces operating costs. Like us, our users place a lot of value in speed — that’s why we’ve decided to take site speed into account in our search rankings. We use a variety of sources to determine the speed of a site relative to other sites.

Satisfied users.

If you still haven’t grasped the concept: Google has always emphasized that it liked pages made for users and not for search engines. A faster loading page means a satisfied user and as Google has all to win when it concerns satisfied users it is using what satisfies them, fast pages, as a ranking tool. Now, those having never seen the usefulness of Google Webmaster Tools can start running there to open their accounts.

:grin:

How to?

There are some simple ways of improving a site’s speed. First things first, use pingdom tools to evaluate your page’s load time. What I like with this new factor is that web designers will have to go back to the basics, re-use the core of web design coding, i.e. writing standards based code.

Standards.

Great day for standards. Using semantic and clean code will definitely help improve a page’s loading time. Using basic and clean tags will help your pages load in a whizz. Make sure you do not use deprecated tags and keep to your document definition (strict, transitional…etc.). Moreover, when using standards you get yourself a step ahead in optimising your code as the latter is easily maintained and you can just get any other coder to dive into your page to optimise it.

With the use of standards, you are bound to reduce the number of lines of code you would have originally used. Thus, pages are lighter and load time is decreased. All benefits!

External CSS.

Using standards implies the separation of presentation and content. This is done through the use of Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) and, more important, the use of external CSS. This also has an impact on your page load time. Why? Having all CSS in one external file means that the file will load only once (on the first page a site is visited) then, the same file is used by the browser to load all the other pages’ presentation. This means that your site’s pages will load faster as the CSS will be read only once and you will not have duplicate code to maintain all the time in each page if your CSS is written in them.

To get the most out of your CSS in terms of load time you can also improve the CSS file itself. Check out a previous article on how you can make pages load faster by minimising the CSS file.

External behaviour.

Should you be having behaviour on your pages (be they through Java or DOM scripting), the same advice as that for CSS goes. You need to externalise all the code to one external page to avoid constant recalls to all your functions each time a page is loaded. You can also think about progressive enhancement to improve the page loading when scripts are not activated or fail to load. All in all, keeping these simple and short will help improve your page loading capabilities. Other enhancements include the loading of all scripts after the content.

More…

These here are some simple examples on how the code can help pages in improving in terms of load times. It is very important to take these into consideration at the beginning of a project to maximise its ROI. This is a great example on how code and coding strategies can improve SEO, and Google is now making use of it.

You can push further in the ways a page’s load time can be improved for example, the choice of your server or image optimisation strategies.

Optimising your site to get Google sitelinks.

Google has unveiled a lot on the way its algorithm works and on how the company actually works to promote its own products on the engine. Google Webmaster Central has published an article on the SEO report cards that Google uses to maximize its products’ visibility on its own search engine. There is a lot of things present in there and it all gravitates around tuning up one’s pages for better ranking and increased user interest. One part on which I really perused is the building up of sitelinks.

Sitelinks for the dumb.

Google sitelinks are very easy to spot. They are direct inputs to a site’s inner links, categories, themes… The advantage of such an option is that it allows the user to go directly to some specific part of a site, thus maximising conversion by, for example, removing any redundant step like going through the main page. Sitelinks look like this:

Google sitelinks example

The Google SEO report card defines it as such:

Sitelinks are often a signal to users that they’ve found the result they’re looking for and can help in finding information faster.

How to get sitelinks?

This is the trick question in the whole system. Webmasters can’t choose when sitelinks are shown. Up to now, nobody knows when, how and who triggers the sitelinks. There are different assumptions on the subject but no one really knows if it is human powered or not. However, the report card shows that there is a 56% of changes to have an incoming click through sitelinks on a search engine results page. So what can you do to get sitelinks then?

The SEO report card states that an improved site organisation and good internal linking strategies can improve the chances of getting them. Here are the instructions:

  • use a hierarchical site structure
  • use descriptive anchor text and links pointing to internal pages
  • avoid deep nesting of content behind many subdirectories

Bonus feature.

The bonus given by Google concerning the sitelinks is that they can be optimised for providing relevant information, helping the users find the content they want faster and, a really nice way of putting things, taking up more real estate on the search results page (the result taking more space on the page).

The card coins good sitelinks as “Appealing Google Sitelinks”. These sitelinks are those that really do the job, those that give the relevant information or provide the user with the best options. For those oblivious of the use of Google Webmaster tools, there is an option in it that allows the webmasters to block unappealing sitelinks.

Let’s talk about this…

There you go then. Have your say on sitelinks. I think that some of the information must not be taken as rules of law but believe that they are nice starting points for such optimisations.

Have you been trying to get them for specific sites? Have you been working on them and have you had positive results? Will you be using the Google Webmaster Tools to get those links?

What’s in a name? Domain name and hosting strategies.

There are hundreds of articles on the subject of domain names all over the web. Most of them deal with the choice of the domain names associated to a brand, a company or on why top level domain names are important in the definition of your SEO strategies. Actually, a lot of these articles talk about what could be coined as “the usability of domain names”.

The usability of domain names.

The usability of domain names is the whole marketing jargon buster used to help a client define a domain name. It is here to define branding and visibilityof a brand online. One great resource for that is “Building the Perfect Beast” (pdf document) by Igor International.

The elements are generally:

  • Size of the domain name (the smaller the better, as it seems).
  • Easy to remember (to print in your customers’ minds).
  • Business related (aiming your field).
  • Top level domain (to maximize indexation).
  • Inclusion of keywords (improving ranking through the domain name).

You might be careful.

Some of these advice might have flip sides to them though. The size of the domain name, if coupled with the inclusion of keywords, might not be compatible if you’re trying to become a leader in your field. An example might be DCDM where the name De Chazal du Mée is long and does not give the information that the company is that of chartered accountants.

As such their domain name does not show this aspect either. OK, DCDM is known in Mauritius, what about the international aspect? The branding does not include the fact that the company is big in Africa. Maybe some domain name such as dcdm-chartered-accoutants.tld (top level domain name) would help. To push the envelope a little bit further, the domain name would take care of at least 4 of the elements stated above.

Local you said?

What about local search then? It might seem cool to look for interesting domain names but if the primary audience is local, it would be better not to aim past the target. For example, the Web Design Bureau targets Mauritian web designers. The domain name is therefore a top level one mixed with the “mauritius” keyword. It could have been more specific but this is like that for one specific reason that will not be discussed here.

In a local context it is a good thing to aim for local domain extensions. For example: BBC keeps it domain name centered around the UK www.bbc.co.uk, TF1 in France has a .fr and CNN has a .com (generic extension used in US instead of the .us). None has really gone for the .tv extension but the MBC has tried it out.

What about hosting?

Any domain name with a real website needs to be hosted. Hosting does influence SEO. First of all there is the neighbourhood. On mutualised servers, some domain names can be blacklisted or have bad reputation (the Bureau suffers a bit from hosted porn neighbourhood). Therefore, one should make sure that the site is clearly well hosted.

In the case of multiple websites, one interesting thing is to work on different C class domain IPs. Each site has a unique IP number. If different websites are to be hosted, having really different C class IPs can help when working on different sites’ net linking. Different addresses mean different servers to the robots, so it might really be a win-win strategy to use different hosting companies.

Let’s talk about this…

What concepts did you use to chose your domain name? Why do you have a top level domain or any other level domain name? Do you have a domain name strategy? Are you thinking of changing domains and work on it strategically?

Would Twitter be better for SEO without URL shorteners?

Alice’s last post on the changes in search engines as well as the advent of real time search in SERPs (Search Engine Results Pages) triggered a specific question: how to maximize the use of Twitter posts from an SEO point of view? We are today working towards Social Media Optimisation but the objective here is to have a reflection on how such a tool can become a stepping stone in an SEO strategy.

Anchor text.

All SEO experts will stress on the importance of anchor text in net and deep linking strategies. If you’re not at ease with SEO, here’s a quick overview of the use of anchor text. Anchor text is the text generally used in linking. Most of the time it looks like: read more here/more here etc… One of the core elements in search engine rankings is the number of incoming links. However, search engine robots do not only evaluate if the incoming link is from a high PR page or from a homepage but also what the link tells it before it scans the landing page. Thus a “read more here” text gives less information than, e.g., “web design company” in the link. This IS the anchor text. The robot will evaluate it and have a first information about the theme of the landing page. It is therefore interesting to optimise this anchor text when you’re building your linking strategies.

The Twitter case.

Any Twitter user will have spotted the issue on the basis of the anchor text definition. There are 2 issues concerning Twitter:

  • As shown lately, url shorteners have been a problem (not huge but still) as viruses or phishing/malware pages can be hidden behind these urls. The problem does not come from hiding something behind a link itself, it can be done with any link. However, some users might be frightened of clicking on links now (which is the exact contrary of the current usage of the tool).
  • As an SEO expert, if Search Engines provide real time content by showing Tweets in SERPs, it would really be interesting to have real anchor texts which will increase the visibility of the landing page be it for a user or a search engine robot.

Anchor text, a solution?

Today, the usage is url shorteners but it might be a good thing to add (or replace) this with the possibility of adding links to anchor text in one’s tweet. This would have some major advantages on the marketing front:

  • As stated earlier, a major help in terms of SEO and link building.
  • A better use of the 140 characters available as space will not be eaten up by the url sent out.
  • The follower might have better incentives to click on a link if the latter has explicit anchor text.

Let’s talk about this…

In the light of this exposé do you think that twitter would be better for SEO without URL shorteners? Do you think that Twitter should add such a linking tool or replace the use of these? Do you think that SEO strategies through Twitter would be great?

I can add my personal view on this: Twitter will not be doing it! Let’s talk about it in the comments.

What will change in 2010 with search engines ranking? (Google speaking only? Not sure …)

It will soon come the time where SEO may well be much more a matter of traffic management and analysis than ranking.

Search engines positioning standards are constantly moving, making ranking a permanent issue for websites visibility and business. Up to now, being the first (or at least at the top 5 of the first page) of Google was the real thing.

This reality is doomed to disappear.

Why?

Because Google now focuses on 3 distinct measures for ranking (and will be doing so even more in the near future):

  • Local and personal data (IP address, language, researches history: whether you are connected with a Google account or not).
  • Universal search is getting mixed up within search engines results pages for good (images, videos, podcasts, RSS. All this with results suggestions: definitions, similar / closed researches …).
  • Real time information included in Google results pages (social networking news, such as Twitter tweets already in Google results – probably tomorrow your FaceBook friends news – and for sure Google Buzz messages. Also used, what is new: keywords buzz at a defined time).

Of course, the already known key standards for ranking are still to be used, but their importance is decreasing for some of them (keyword in links, images, footer …).

What we are going towards is personalisation.
In the near future, do not be surprised if two persons doing the same keyword research at a time on Google will have different results pages …

What can you do?

I strongly recommend you to consider the 4 advice below:

  • Forget about search engine positioning as it is (looking in Google where your website is for a particular keyword). Have a look in the Google Webmaster tools which indicates the ranking tendency of your web site: this is probably the best indicator available.
  • Analyse your keywords traffic (in your traffic analytics tool: Google Analytics, Xiti …): consider even more your search engines traffic part as a whole. Identify your keywords groups based on common themes, and work on it.
  • Reschedule your SEO time: the long tail effect is getting a strong reality to face. As it is (or will) become 80% of your website visits, it has to be 80% of your optimisation time (and 20% with the other “top visits” keywords).
  • Stick to the fresh news and identify the popular keyword linked to them (use Google Ad Planner). Use them in your articles and news. Share your news as much as possible.

All of this is very Google oriented, but let me bet Yahoo / Bing will do just the same … in 2011?

A French version of this article is available here: Evolution du positionnement en 2010 – les choses à savoir

De Chazal du Mée’s (DCDM) website can harm your computer.

Starting this post is quite weird for me in the sense that I don’t really know how to tackle it, what tone to give it or how to deal with it. So I’m setting out to explain that I’m a human being, more than less pacifist and ready to learn and share information and knowledge with people around me. This last statement is the aim of the Web Design Bureau of Mauritius itself even if the targeted audience is really small. I however have a big problem with the Mauritian mentality. People cannot be honest enough and contact you simply asking for an information or a review or whatever can be their needs in terms of project management, SEO or design. So to all who don’t know how to write a mail here’s a template:

Hi,

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Mauris lacinia arcu ac lorem vulputate euismod. Donec tempus ullamcorper facilisis. Phasellus orci augue, malesuada et luctus at, consequat ac odio. Proin et elit sed dui sodales luctus. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus ac felis euismod lacus suscipit commodo. Integer ac augue purus, vel viverra nulla. Ut volutpat ultricies volutpat. Vestibulum commodo imperdiet elit, ac posuere tortor faucibus at.

Best regards
Insert your signature here.

Friendly tip: being polite gives you extra points!

Explaining things to you dear reader.

I know that a lot of my regular readers must be wondering what I’m talking about here. Let’s get to the root of things. Last year I used the DCDM example to illustrate my article on what Mauritian companies were missing on the web. Fair enough, this has had some positive impact (I’m sure) on how this major Mauritian company saw its own online presence. This would explain why, nearly everyday over the past 2 weeks, somebody has been trying to attract my attention to the DCDM issue.

The problem with all this is that (and this meets the first part of my post) the person or persons DID NOT have the humility of sending me a mail or using the contact form available on the Bureau to ask me to do a review of their site (at least that’s what I’m thinking it is) or to write a sequel to the previously published article. No! This person or these persons has/have been spending his/their time making the same query on Google for nearly 13 days. Is that stupid or what? Proof:

Search results for DCDM and Web Design Bureau

Along with that, an in depth analysis of the IP address, strangely from the same C class domain over the whole period, analysis gives more than guilty info from the Google user. Proxies anybody?

Letting time run by.

At first I stayed on my position of not saying anything about this because one of my core convictions is that if people did communicate, a lot of our everyday problems would be solved. As these queries have stopped since this week-end I’ve stepped out to really see why someone would have spent all this energy trying to inform me that I should maybe give a look to the DCDM website. Which I tried to do this evening but…

… and it’s a major BUT.

The most astonishing thing happened. I tried a Google search for DCDM. The idea was to look at their website and also catch up with the previous article’s position in the SERPs (Search Engine Results Pages) to see that it does not do too much harm in DCDM’s rankings. But, as The Beatles put it: “Hey Jude, don’t take it bad…” the DCDM website has gone from being an outrage to the company to a complete ordeal for any user. I don’t know how they coded the thing but Google has blocked it as “This site might harm your computer.” for malware detection.

De Chazal du Mée website can harm your computer.

Don’t try clicking on the “more” results, you’ll get more of the harmful message.

What is going on here is that the whole project is turning into a fiasco having major impact on the Company’s online reputation and, if they’ve got an IT department, they really have to see to it that the people they’re employing do really have the necessary competences. I mean, it is easy and fun to play with Google to leave “Dan Brown” style breadcrumbs to the Bureau but it would be best to spend that time to check the code, the SEO and the compatibility issues of one’s website.

This is it!

I’m borrowing this quote from the late King of Pop. We all have knowledge and work in our fields. The web design field is still young and improving in Mauritius and methodology and standards are core elements that should be inculcated to the workforce. Another thing is that web design projects, and any project in general is lead according to some very humane principles, humility, communication, politeness and dedication. Without these tensions creep in and grow, people lose their temper and the final aim of the project gets out of focus. It is the same for people, especially those you don’t know. So don’t come round on your big steeds to conquer. I’m always willing to help the best I can and you might get something just by asking rather than brute-forcing the whole thing.

How would you have reacted to this situation? Do you think that this show the professionalism of the whole company? Is this the type of company you’d contact if the service ends like this?